|
Post by David Lahti on Mar 4, 2014 21:21:18 GMT -5
In Narrow Roads of Gene Land (vol. 1, p.485-487), W. D. Hamilton proposes a hypothesis that simultaneously explains (1) the rise to stardom of the University of Michigan in the 70s-90s, and (2) the peculiar kind of argumentativeness of graduate students from the period:
"At the University of Michigan, Richard Alexander, long a prime mover in the study of social evolution... had persuaded his colleague Donald TInkle, likewise an exceptional evolutionist and currently the Director of the University Museum, to consider that I might be a useful colleague in the museum and in the graduate teaching programme of the university...
"The degree of interest in evolution may have been a special Michigan feature. As a result of, I think, the influence of Richard Alexander and later other faculty members he had encouraged to be there, the university had acquired a reputation throughout the whole USA as one of the very best campus destinations to which you might 'U-haul' your possessions, including your bachelor's or master's degree, but, most important of all, your research-oriented curiosity about fish, ferns, birds, lakes, lizards, insects-- or simply about evolution per se.
"...Certainly the biology graduate students gained a nationwide reputation, if for nothing else, as being the most argumentative in the land.
"Was this all, perhaps, a meme complex emanating from one source-- my patron Alexander?"
|
|
|
Post by dcmarshall on Mar 9, 2014 23:50:39 GMT -5
Oxford online says argumentative means "given to arguing" or "using or characterized by systematic reasoning". I suppose Hamilton could have meant either one. What I experienced there was a tacit agreement by all present in discussions that "getting it straight" (a favorite phrase of Alexander's, whether or not he was the principal source of this attitude) was more important than protecting egos.
|
|